You are here
Home > BLOG > Flow Mechanics > Non-equilibrium dynamics of dense gas under tight confinement

Non-equilibrium dynamics of dense gas under tight confinement

Non-equilibrium dynamics of dense gas under tight confinement

In the slip flow regime, a larger Kne has a flatter velocity profile and hence smaller MFR (see the first row in the inset of figure 9). Near the free-molecular flow regime, the slip velocity Ux(y=±1/2) is proportional to √(T(y=±1/2)), and since √(T (y = ±1/2)/F) decreases as the normalized external acceleration F increases, the normalized velocity slip Vx(y=±1/2) = Ux(y=±1/2)/F decreases as F increases (see the second row in the inset of figure 9), and so the MFR decreases because the normalized density profile is nearly unitary across the channel when Kn is large. Similar effects of the external force on the MFR are also observed at other values of L/σ and α.

Conclusions

Through both numerical solution of the generalized Enskog equation and analytical approaches, we have investigated the force-driven Poiseuille flow of a gas between two parallel plates. The dilute-to-dense gas exhibited new flow physics due to the competition of three characteristic length scales: the mean free path, the channel width and the molecular diameter. For elastic collisions in the hard-disc gas, we found the following. (i) In the slip flow regime, the normalized MFR becomes smaller as the confinement (i.e. L/σ) becomes tighter, for a fixed Knudsen number.

In the limit of L/σ → ∞, the MFR approaches that of the Boltzmann equation (in which the binary collisions are localized in space). When L/σ is fixed, the variation of the MFR with the Knudsen number is not monotonic. As the Knudsen number decreases from 0.1, the MFR first increases and then decreases; the maximum MFR occurs when the average solid fraction is approximately 0.3. We explained this exotic behaviour using the Navier–Stokes equation with a first-order velocity slip boundary condition. (ii) In the free-molecular flow regime, for a fixed Knudsen number, the MFR increases as L/σ is reduced, but in the limit L/σ → ∞ the MFR is reduced to that of the Boltzmann equation. Our simple treatment of the average collision frequency accurately captures the influence of the tight wall confinement. (iii) In the transitional flow regime, for a fixed Knudsen number, the variation of the MFR with L/σ is not monotonic, and the minimum MFR is achieved at L/σ ≈ 2–3.

When the collisions between the hard discs are inelastic, we found that the MFR increases as the restitution coefficient decreases due to the increase of the velocity slip and the decrease of the effective Knudsen number. We also proposed a simple formula to predict the anomalous velocity slip (which decreases as the Knudsen number increases). This simple formula and numerical solutions of the generalized Enskog equation also showed that the slip velocity could remain constant with varying Knudsen number at appropriate values of L/σ and the restitution coefficient. Finally, we showed that the normalized MFR reduces as the normalized external acceleration increases. Although we have only considered the diffuse boundary condition, the use of other momentum accommodation coefficients yield qualitatively the same results.

This research sheds new light on the influence of tight confinement on the mass flow rate of dense gases, and indicates that the MFR for Poiseuille flow obtained from the Boltzmann equation is not accurate for dense gases. For practical application to predicting the permeability of ultra-tight shale strata, more work needs to be done; for instance, to include the mean-field term so that a realistic equation of state for the shale gas is recovered, and to properly deal with the gas–wall interactions. Also, the inclusion of a mean-field term will enable us to study the flow dynamics of dense charged grains.

Acknowledgements

This work is financially supported by the UK’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under grants EP/M021475/1, EP/L00030X/1, EP/K038621/1, EP/I011927/1 and EP/N016602/1. H.L. gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the ‘Thousand Talents Program’ for Distinguished Young Scholars and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. 51506168.

R E F E R E N C E S

  1. AL A M , M., MA H A JA N , A. & SH I VA N NA , D. 2015 On Knudsen-minimum effect and temperature bimodality in a dilute granular Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 782, 99–126.
  2. AO K I , K., TA K ATA , S. & NA K A N I S H I , T. 2002 Poiseuille-type flow of a rarefied gas between two parallel plates driven by a uniform external force. Phys. Rev. E 65, 026315.
  3. AR A N S O N , I. S. & TS I M R I N G , L. S. 2006 Patterns and collective behavior in granular media: theoretical concepts. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 641–692.
  4. BA R BA N T E , P., FR E Z Z OT T I , A. & GI B E L L I , L. 2015 A kinetic theory description of liquid menisci at the microscale. Kinet. Relat. Models 8, 235–254.
  5. BAU S , M. & CO L OT, J. L. 1987 Thermodynamics and structure of a fluid of hard rods, disks, spheres, or hyperspheres from rescaled virial expansions. Phys. Rev. A 36, 3912–3925.
  6. BO B Y L E V, A. V., CA R R I L L O , J. A. & GA M BA , I. M. 2000 On some properties of kinetic and hydrodynamic equations for inelastic interactions. J. Stat. Phys. 98, 743–773.
  7. BR E Y, J. J., DU F T Y, J. W. & SA N TO S , A. 1997 Dissipative dynamics for hard spheres. J. Stat. Phys. 87, 1051–1066.
  8. BR I L L I A N TOV, N. & PÖ S C H E L , T. 2004 Kinetic Theory of Granular Gases. Oxford University Press. CE R C I G NA N I , C. 1963 Plane Poiseuille flow and Knudsen minimum effect. In Rarefied Gas Dynamics (ed. J. A. Laurmann), vol. II, pp. 92–101.
  9. CE R C I G NA N I , C., LA M P I S , M. & LO R E N Z A N I , S. 2007 On the Reynolds equation for linearized models of the Boltzmann operator. Transp. Theory Stat. Phys. 36, 257–280.
  10. CH A P M A N , S. & COW L I N G , T. G. 1970 The Mathematical Theory of Non-Uniform Gases. Cambridge University Press.
  11. DA R A B I , H., ET T E H A D , A., JAVA D P O U R , F. & SE P E H R N O O R I , K. 2012 Gas flow in ultra-tight shale strata. J. Fluid Mech. 710, 641–658.
  12. ES T E BA N , M. J. & PE RT H A M E , B. 1991 On the modified Enskog equation for elastic and inelastic collisions. Models with spin. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 8, 289–308.
  13. FR E Z Z OT T I , A. 1997 A particle scheme for the numerical solution of the Enskog equation. Phys. Fluids 9, 1329–1335.
  14. FR E Z Z OT T I , A. 1998 Molecular dynamics and Enskog theory calculation of shock profiles in a dense hard sphere gas. Comput. Math. Applics. 35, 103–112.
  15. FR E Z Z OT T I , A., GI B E L L I , L. & LO R E N Z A N I , S. 2005 Mean field kinetic theory description of evaporation of a fluid into vacuum. Phys. Fluids 17, 012102.
  16. FU K U I , S. & KA N E KO , R. 1987 Analysis of ultra-thin gas film lubrication based on the linearized Boltzmann equation (influence of accommodation coefficient). JSME Intl J. 30, 1660–1666.
  17. FU K U I , S. & KA N E KO , R. 1990 A database for interpolation of Poiseuille flow rates for high Knudsen number lubrication problems. J. Tribol. 112, 78–83.
  18. GA LV I N , J. E., HR E N YA , C. M. & WI L D M A N , R. D. 2007 On the role of the Knudsen layer in rapid granular flows. J. Fluid Mech. 585, 73–92.
  19. GA R C I A -RO J O , R., LU D I N G , S. & BR E Y, J. J. 2006 Transport coefficients for dense hard-disk systems. Phys. Rev. E 74, 061305.
  20. GA R Z Ó , V. & DU F T Y, J. W. 1999 Dense fluid transport for inelastic hard spheres. Phys. Rev. E 59, 5895–5911.
  21. GO L D S T E I N , A. & SH A P I RO , M. 1995 Mechanics of collisional motion of granular materials. Part 1. General hydrodynamic equations. J. Fluid Mech. 282, 75–114.
  22. GR M E L A , M. 1971 Kinetic equation approach to phase transitions. J. Stat. Phys. 3, 347–364.
  23. GU , X. J. & EM E R S O N , D. R. 2009 A high-order moment approach for capturing non-equilibrium phenomena in the transition regime. J. Fluid Mech. 636, 177–216.
  24. HA D J I C O N S TA N T I N O U , N. G. 2003 Comment on Cercignani’s second-order slip coefficient. Phys. Fluids 15, 2352–2354.
  25. HE N D E R S O N , D. 1975 Simple equation of state for hard disks. Mol. Phys. 30, 971–972.
  26. HO LT, J. K., PA R K , H. G., WA N G , Y., STA D E R M A N N , M., ART Y U K H I N , A. B., GR I G O RO P O U L O S , C. P., NOY, A. & BA K A J I N , O. 2006 Fast mass transport through sub-2-nanometer carbon nanotubes. Science 312, 1034–1037.
  27. KA R K H E C K , J. & ST E L L , G. 1981 Mean field kinetic theories. J. Chem. Phys. 75, 1475–1487.
  28. KA R N I A DA K I S , G., BE S KO K , A. & AL U RU , N. R. 2005 Microflows and Manoflows: Fundamentals and Simulations. Springer.
  29. KN U D S E N , M. 1909 Die Gesetze der Molekularströmung und der inneren Reibungsströmung der Gase durch Röhren. Ann. Phys. 333, 75–130.
  30. KO N , M., KO BAYA S H I , K. & WATA NA B E , M. 2014 Method of determining kinetic boundary conditions in net evaporation/condensation. Phys. Fluids 26, 072003.
  31. LU NAT I , I. & LE E , S. H. 2014 A dual-tube model for gas dynamics in fractured nanoporous shale formations. J. Fluid Mech. 757, 943–971.
  32. LU T S KO , J. F. 2005 Transport properties of dense dissipative hard-sphere fluids for arbitrary energy loss models. Phys. Rev. E 72, 021306.
  33. MA , J., SA N C H E Z , J. P., WU , K., CO U P L E S , G. D. & JI A N G , Z. 2014 A pore network model for simulating non-ideal gas flow in micro- and nano-porous materials. Fuel 116, 498–508.
  34. ME H M A N I , A., PRO DA N OV I C´ , M. & JAVA D P O U R , F. 2013 Multiscale, multiphysics network modeling of shale matrix gas flows. Transp. Porous Med. 88, 377–390.
  35. ME N G , J. P., WU , L., RE E S E , J. M. & ZH A N G , Y. 2013 Assessment of the ellipsoidal-statistical Bhatnagar–Gross–Krook model for force-driven Poiseuille flows. J. Comput. Phys. 251, 383–395.
  36. OH WA DA , T., SO N E , Y. & AO K I , K 1989a Numerical analysis of the Poiseuille and thermal transpiration flows between two parallel plates on the basis of the Boltzmann equation for hard sphere molecules. Phys. Fluids 1, 2042–2049.
  37. OH WA DA , T., SO N E , Y. & AO K I , K. 1989b Numerical analysis of the shear and thermal creep flows of a rarefied gas over a plane wall on the basis of the linearzied Boltzmann equation for hard-sphere molecules. Phys. Fluids A 1, 1588–1599.
  38. SA N C H E Z , I. C. 1994 Virial coefficients and close-packing of hard spheres and discs. J. Chem. Phys. 101, 7003–7006.
  39. TA K ATA , S. & FU NAG A N E , H. 2011 Poiseuille and thermal transpiration flows of a highly rarefied gas: over-concentration in the velocity distribution function. J. Fluid Mech. 669, 242–259.
  40. TI J , M. & SA N TO S , A. 2004 Poiseuille flow in a heated granular gas. J. Stat. Phys. 117, 901–928.
  41. WA N G , Q., CH E N , X., JH A , A. & RO G E R S , H. 2014 Natural gas from shale formation – the evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 30, 1–28.
  42. WU , L., ZH A N G , Y. & RE E S E , J. M. 2015 Fast spectral solution of the generalized Enskog equation for dense gases. J. Comput. Phys. 303, 66–79.

 

Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

© Cambridge University Press 2016

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/jfm.2016.173

 

 

 

 

 

Emanuel Martin
Emanuel Martin is a Petroleum Engineer graduate from the Faculty of Engineering and a musician educate in the Arts Faculty at National University of Cuyo. In an independent way he’s researching about shale gas & tight oil and building this website to spread the scientist knowledge of the shale industry.
http://www.allaboutshale.com

Leave a Reply

seventeen − four =

Top